Publication Ethics

Publication Ethics of Jurnal Manajemen Informatika (JEMARI)

Publication ethics in Jurnal Manajemen Informatika (JEMARI) adhere to the regulations outlined in Head of the Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI) Regulation Number 5 of 2014 concerning the Code of Ethics for Scientific Publications. The key points are summarized as follows:

Duties and Responsibilities of Journal Managers and Publishers

• Determine the journal’s name, scientific scope, and publication frequency, and apply for accreditation if necessary.
• Appoint members of the editorial board.
• Establish the roles and responsibilities of publishers, editors, reviewers, and other related parties through a formal agreement.
• Maintain confidentiality for all contributors, including authors, editors, and reviewers.
• Adhere to norms and regulations regarding intellectual property rights, especially copyright.
• Regularly review journal policies and communicate them to authors, editorial board members, reviewers, and readers.
• Establish ethical guidelines for editors and reviewers.
• Publish the journal consistently according to the set schedule.
• Secure financial resources to ensure the sustainability of journal publication.
• Build collaborations with research institutions and relevant organizations.
• Manage legal aspects, including licensing and regulatory requirements.

Duties and Responsibilities of the Editor

• Balance the interests of readers and authors while striving for continuous quality improvement in publications.
• Ensure a rigorous review process to maintain the quality of published articles.
• Promote academic freedom and objective discussion.
• Uphold the integrity of authors' academic records.
• Provide necessary corrections, clarifications, or retractions when required.
• Oversee the writing style and formatting while ensuring content accuracy remains the author’s responsibility.
• Encourage feedback from authors, readers, reviewers, and editorial board members to enhance publication quality.
• Conduct regular internal evaluations to assess the quality of the journal.
• Support ethical publishing practices by requiring ethical clearance forms during manuscript submission.
• Be receptive to new perspectives, even if they differ from personal views, for the advancement of knowledge.
• Avoid biased decision-making by ensuring scientific objectivity in resolving differences of opinion.
• Guide authors in improving their manuscripts until they meet publication standards.

Duties and Responsibilities of Reviewers

• Conduct manuscript evaluations and provide constructive feedback to assist editors in determining the suitability of a paper for publication.
• Avoid reviewing articles in which they have a direct or indirect conflict of interest.
• Offer constructive suggestions and recommendations for manuscript improvement.
• Maintain confidentiality by not disclosing or distributing review comments and suggestions.
• Encourage authors to enhance their manuscripts to meet publication standards.
• Evaluate revised manuscripts according to the journal’s established criteria.
• Complete the review process in a timely manner, ensuring that assessments align with scientific principles, including research methodology, author credibility, and conclusions.

Duties and Responsibilities of Authors

• Ensure that all listed authors meet the authorship criteria.
• Take collective responsibility for the content, including research methods, analysis, calculations, and findings.
• Disclose all sources of funding and other support, whether direct or indirect.
• Clearly state the limitations of their research.
• Respond professionally and promptly to feedback from reviewers and the editorial board.
• Notify the editor in writing if they intend to withdraw their manuscript.
• Provide a declaration that the submitted manuscript is original, has not been published elsewhere in any language, and is not under review by another publisher.